{"id":31016,"date":"2021-07-27T17:47:08","date_gmt":"2021-07-27T15:47:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/?p=31016"},"modified":"2025-09-19T17:08:12","modified_gmt":"2025-09-19T15:08:12","slug":"the-risk-of-fiction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/the-risk-of-fiction\/","title":{"rendered":"The Risk of Fiction"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"project":[357],"project_type":[725,726,735,738],"class_list":["post-31016","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","project-solitude-blog","project_type-formats","project_type-text","project_type-spheres-of-practice","project_type-scientific"],"acf":{"bgcolor":"","bgcolor_custom":"","custom_color_css_variable":"","content_type":[{"acf_fc_layout":"content_txt","acfe_flexible_layout_title":"Text","bgcolor":"","bgcolor_custom":"","layout_col_size":8,"txt_cols":"is-1-txtcol","txt":"<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>\u00bbIt is difficult, if not impossible, to form any correct idea of these objects, because they behave not like bodies but like weightless thoughts\r\n<\/em>- C. G. Jung<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>\u00bbI also think a lot about how it began, just a few years ago, when ships appeared in orbit and artifacts appeared in meadows. The government said next to nothing about them, while the tabloids said every possible thing.\u00ab\r\n<\/em><em>\u2013 <\/em>Ted Chiang<em>, Story of Your Life<\/em><\/p>"},{"acf_fc_layout":"content_txt","acfe_flexible_layout_title":"Text","bgcolor":"","bgcolor_custom":"","layout_col_size":8,"txt_cols":"is-1-txtcol","txt":"Something is changing regarding these strange phenomena. When Carl Gustav Jung wrote his essay on flying saucers, first published in 1958, he was worried about the damage it could cause to his reputation. Surprisingly or not, some pages after stating that he is not a believer in Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), he refers to how the emergence of the astrological era of Aquarius might affect the contemporary collective psyche.<sup class=\"is-footnote\">1<\/sup>\r\n\r\nToday we read in the esteemed pages of <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/07\/23\/us\/politics\/pentagon-ufo-harry-reid-navy.html?searchResultPosition=10\">The New York Times<\/a>,<\/em><sup class=\"is-footnote\">2<\/sup><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2021\/may\/29\/ufos-uap-america-pentagon-report\"> The Guardian<\/a>,<\/em><sup class=\"is-footnote\">3<\/sup> or <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/magazine\/2021\/05\/10\/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriously\">The New Yorker<\/a>,<\/em><sup class=\"is-footnote\">4<\/sup> how United States senators are articulating Pentagon programs to reveal at least some of what is known about UFO phenomena.<sup class=\"is-footnote\">5<\/sup> The Chilean government has an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cefaa.gob.cl\/home\/quienes-somos\">official agency<\/a> to address the subject,<sup class=\"is-footnote\">6<\/sup> and some national Air Forces, like the Brazilian one, have released a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.br\/mj\/pt-br\/assuntos\/noticias\/mais-de-700-registros-de-aparicao-de-ovnis-no-brasil\">number of documents<\/a> previously kept as secret files.<sup class=\"is-footnote\">7<\/sup> The recent news articles left behind the mockery that would come around the theme until recently. I wonder how Jung would react to that, and to knowing that newspapers won't talk about astrology in their politics sessions, at least not without some great dose of irony.\r\n<h5><strong>Fearing the unknown<\/strong><\/h5>\r\nThe year was 1993, and I was eight years old. I was with my parents in the apartment of my grandmother in Urca, a neighborhood in Rio de Janeiro near the beautiful scenery and the polluted waters of Guanabara Bay. That evening, the sea\u2019s low bubbling was masked by the television, around which people sat talking. My uncles drank beer. I was playing with my cousin, and my little brother was about to go to sleep, when a characteristic tune came from the TV: the weekly documentary on the most-watched channel in Brazil, Globo Rep\u00f3rter, was starting. I was already expecting it with some apprehension. I knew the episode was about UFOs and close encounters with extraterrestrial beings.\r\n\r\nThe next thing I remember, I was screaming at the top of my lungs. People tried to calm me down, but I was engulfed by fear. The images of abductions and bizarre experiments conducted by gray humanoid aliens, taken from the film <em>Fire in the Sky<\/em> released the same year, would haunt my dreams ever since. For a long time, I couldn't look at the night sky. Even today, when I\u2019m alone in dark spaces, I have an underlying fear of being abducted. And the opening theme music of Globo Rep\u00f3rter still gives me goosebumps.\r\n<blockquote>\u00bbMaybe the intelligent beings behind UFOs are not so much like \u00bbus\u00ab in regard to colonialism and extermination. (...) We could take this as an opportunity to rethink our relation to technology and, most importantly, the presumption that modern humans are on the top of the scale of progress.\u00ab<\/blockquote>\r\nOne of the most remarkable features about UFOs is the arduous task of separating \u00bbhard facts\u00ab from the wild associations that the theme seems to invite. The reports present disturbing variations, and it is usually taken under the same umbrella things such as lights glimpsed in the nocturnal sky, unknown objects captured by radar equipment, strange events in nuclear weapons facilities, abductions, operations to cover up crashed alien aircraft (sometimes surrounded by mysterious humanoid corpses), interplanetary sex, telepathy, metamaterials \u2026 the list can be long. Even when you think you found a rational, factual path to get into this, it seems inevitable that you will soon fall into the realm of the fantastic.\r\n\r\nIf there is something we know about UFOs, or UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, as they have recently been called), is that \u00bbwe\u00ab don\u2019t know much about them.<sup class=\"is-footnote\">8<\/sup> Faced with a vast array of unknowns, our collective cognition seems to present us one thing to hold on to: <em>it<\/em> must have come from another world. The association between UFOs and extraterrestrial beings soaks our collective imaginary on the subject.\r\n\r\nThis is not restricted to science fiction. In the document known as the COMETA Report, a group of former high-ranking French officials \u2013 generals and scientists, including a former chairman of the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) \u2013 examined the evidence on UFOs in France and elsewhere and concluded that about five percent of sightings cannot be easily explained. This small percentage seems to be \u00bbcompletely unknown flying machines with exceptional performances that are guided by a natural or artificial intelligence.\u00ab<sup class=\"is-footnote\">9<\/sup> They concluded that the most logical explanation for these sightings is \u00bbthe extraterrestrial hypothesis.\u00ab<sup class=\"is-footnote\">10<\/sup><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\"><\/a>"},{"acf_fc_layout":"content_img","acfe_flexible_layout_title":"Bild(er)","bgcolor":"","bgcolor_custom":"","layout_col_size":6,"img_gallery":false,"img":[31019],"img_gallery_format":false},{"acf_fc_layout":"content_txt","acfe_flexible_layout_title":"Text","bgcolor":"","bgcolor_custom":"","layout_col_size":8,"txt_cols":"is-1-txtcol","txt":"<h5><strong>Fact and fiction<\/strong><\/h5>\r\nThe recent official recognition of the reality of UFOs flips the role of the conspiracy theorist in a most unexpected way. It does not change the fact that many ufologists are also conspiracy theorists of sorts. But it renders possible that not every discussion on UFOs is automatically ranked in those trenches.\r\n\r\nTake the 2004 event involving the crew of the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group, one of the largest warships in the world. Radar equipment detected an object moving strangely near the coast of Southern California: first appearing at 24,000 meters, it showed up after a few seconds close to the ocean\u2019s surface. Two fighter planes were sent to investigate. The pilots and their copilots report seen an oval white object close to the ocean\u2019s water, a twelve-meter Tic Tac moving erratically like a ping pong ball bouncing very fast. One of the pilots circled down to check it more closely. The object seemed to acknowledge this and mirrored his move, going upward. When right in front of him, it suddenly disappeared in a flash. Seconds after this, the radar detected what seems to be the same object almost 100 kilometers away. Two other fighters, now equipped with advanced infrared cameras, took off. They made an image of the object \u2013\u00a0one of the videos leaked from a Pentagon internal investigation to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/12\/16\/us\/politics\/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html\"><em>The New York Times<\/em><\/a> in 2017.<sup class=\"is-footnote\">11<\/sup>\r\n\r\nHere we have radar information, the testimony of four extremely well-trained officers on duty (two of them recently retold the story on camera on the classic televised news program <em>60 Minutes<\/em>), and infrared images, whose authenticity is admitted by the Pentagon. Publicly, no one knows what the thing was. One of the best-known skeptics on the subject, a renowned UFO \u00bbdebunker,\u00ab could only raise the hypothesis that the image displays a distant plane, or a bird. What would be the interest of the Pentagon in feeding this media spectacle? The skeptics would soon start speculating about the conspiracy that lies behind it.\r\n\r\nInstead of considering UFOs through the lens of an opposition between fact and fiction, I propose we should rather blur this boundary. It would allow us to pose questions that go beyond the problem of <em>belief<\/em> that has always dominated the theme. Then we could be free to ask ourselves: what if we are really being visited by extraterrestrial beings?<strong>\u00a0<\/strong>\r\n\r\nSince science fiction has explored a number of different scenarios of contact with extraterrestrials, we may take it as a starting point. The Belgian philosopher Isabelle Stengers sees in what she calls \u00bbexperimental science fiction\u00ab<sup class=\"is-footnote\">12<\/sup> a manifestation of what a truly experimental social science could look like. A thinker of how \u00bbhard sciences\u00ab build their knowledge practices, and their political implications, Stengers identifies a deep connection between a certain kind of contemporary sci-fi narratives and the mode of operation of theoretical-experimental sciences.\r\n\r\nThis experimental science fiction sets up <em>thought experiments<\/em> that have a component of <em>risk<\/em>, the risk typical of scientific experiments (reality would answer or not to the device built in the experiment). Science fiction, says Stengers, exposes some of the most important questions of its contemporary world to the \u00bbrisk of fiction.\u00ab Each example of this kind of sci-fi draws specific settings that function as conditions for its own experiment. It generates situated knowledge; the truth affirmations that it allows are relative to the given experiment.\r\n\r\nThe questions exposed to the risk of fiction by the imagined aliens of sci-fi revolve around interspecific, interethnic, intercultural, gender-based, and other differences, as well as relations of predation, genocide, species extinction, slavery, and imperial colonialism. Fictional extraterrestrials evoke a myriad of different images: from multiple kinds of humanoids whose bodies differ from us in minimal aspects, such as colors and proportions, to strange microbes, mechanical beings, ghostly entities, weird plants, insects, mollusks, or even ducks and raccoons, and enigmatic geological formations, it seems like anything can be an alien in the mind of sci-fi creators. This openness is perhaps the only defining attribute of extraterrestriality. The alien being is any kind of Other; it is, by definition, the Other.<a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\"><\/a>\r\n<h5><strong>Alienation<\/strong><\/h5>\r\nMarx\u2019s concept of alienation (<em>Entfremdung<\/em>) \u2013 also translated as <em>estrangement<\/em> \u2013 sounds strange when read through a sci-fi filter. His manuscripts of 1844 bring a fourfold description of alienation: in capitalism, workers are alienated from their products, from productive activity, from fellow workers, and their species-being (<em>Gattungswesen<\/em>) as such. This last aspect seems to give a speculative touch to the concept. The concept of species-being is Marx\u2019s version of what accounts for human exceptionality: while animals produce, says Marx, \u00bbonly under the dominion of immediate physical need, (...) man produces even when he is free from physical need and only truly produces in freedom therefrom. An animal produces only itself, while man reproduces the whole of nature.\u00ab<sup class=\"is-footnote\">13<\/sup> Humans consciously produce their own life, and the activities that make their life possible \u2013 and this is why humans are \u00bbspecies-beings\u00ab in Marx\u2019s view. In capitalism, however, humans are estranged, alienated from their species-being. That specific thing that characterizes humanity as such is taken away from humans once they enter the system of relations that simultaneously alienate them from nature and their own free activity: \u00bbEstranged labor turns thus: (3) Man's species being, both nature and his spiritual species property, into a being alien to him, into a means to his individual existence. It estranges man\u2019s own body from him, as it does external nature and his spiritual essence, his human being.\u00ab<sup class=\"is-footnote\">14<\/sup><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\"><\/a><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\"><\/a><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\"><\/a>\r\n\r\n<a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\"><\/a>"},{"acf_fc_layout":"content_img","acfe_flexible_layout_title":"Bild(er)","bgcolor":"","bgcolor_custom":"","layout_col_size":6,"img_gallery":false,"img":[31021],"img_gallery_format":false},{"acf_fc_layout":"content_txt","acfe_flexible_layout_title":"Text","bgcolor":"","bgcolor_custom":"","layout_col_size":8,"txt_cols":"is-1-txtcol","txt":"Extrapolating on Marx, we could say that in capitalism, we are all aliens \u2013 strangers in relation to the humanity that capitalism abducts from us. This difference between humanity as species-being and the subject in capitalism as an estranged being somehow resonates in the way that aliens are imagined in sci-fi. Aliens almost invariably presuppose a certain image of humanity to which they are alien.\r\n\r\nIt could be, to state an often-repeated idea, that the aliens invading Earth respond to a collective consciousness that threatens human individuality \u2013 this elicits the self-image of humans as individuals provided with free will. Or, in a more original motif, it could be that our extraterrestrial visitors developed nonlinear language and cognition, a simultaneous mode of consciousness, and that our incomprehension of them would only be (partially) overcome if we were to struggle against our all-too-human linear perception of time, our imprisonment by the frames of an inescapable past, an ephemeral present, and an unfathomable future. This \u00bbimprisonment\u00ab would yet also be what makes us free, for knowing the future creates a context in which freedom has no meaning.<sup class=\"is-footnote\">15<\/sup>\r\n\r\nIn Octavia Butler\u2019s\u00a0<em>Lilith\u2019s Brood<\/em>, the aliens arriving on Earth are also the saviors of humanity, which has destroyed itself in atomic warfare. The Oankali cure and revive human survivors aboard their ship, but they also want to repopulate Earth, interbreeding with humans to create a new human\/oankali species. Although in love with humanity, the Oankali point to a defect that they call the \u00bbHuman Contradiction\u00ab: that humans would be doomed to self-destruction because they are simultaneously intelligent and hierarchical.\r\n\r\nButler does not picture this alien encounter through a good\/bad binary \u2013 things are much more complicated than that. Even though she offers a bleak view of humanity, immersed in violence and paranoia, and incredibly averse to change, the alien nature of the Oankali is not simply a positive inversion of these features. The Oankali are not at all like the humans, but they are threatening in their particular way. Are human beings that cohabit with the aliens <em>turning into<\/em> Oankali? Is humanity actually being destroyed in this process of intermixture?\r\n\r\nIn this science fiction, alienation is not a unilateral creation of Otherness, but a twofold process that creates an always partial humanity and an always partial Other. Just like the activation of the concept by Marx lets us know more about the workings of capitalism, we can also tell stories about what makes humans human and Others Other by understanding this differentiation as a process of alienation.\r\n\r\nIsn\u2019t it what Marx does, after all? He portrays the workings of an economic system that is dependent on the creation of two different beings in a relation of alterity to each other. In this sci-fi world, we could say that Earth was invaded by the spectral natives of planet Capital, a colonial metropole of galactic reach. The Capitalians take control of human bodies and imprison human souls (a purple substance called <em>species-being<\/em>) in a huge glass jar orbiting the planet. Of course, they do that with the human-betraying collaboration of the ruling class, called \u00bbcapitalists,\u00ab no less controlled by the extraterrestrials. Only worldwide revolution could break the cycle of domination, exorcising Capitalians from human bodies and making possible a reunification of the human species-being with its material counterpart.\r\n\r\nWhat I am calling alienation here is exactly this kind of relation in which one of the terms related stands for \u00bbhumanity,\u00ab and how the definition of what counts for humanity in this context is variable according to the relation. In sci-fi narratives, even if Terran humans are not present and we are facing, let\u2019s say, a battle between alien species, these species are still imagined in reference to entities that populate Earth; entities from which they are created as estranged beings. And in the background of this creation, you will always have a certain image of humanity, more or less consciously projected by the thought experiment the author proposes: a humanity submitted to the risk of fiction. Authors and readers are, after all, members of the human species \u2013 as far as we know.\r\n<h5><strong>The WoW effect<\/strong><\/h5>\r\nUFOs and science fictional imaginations of extraterrestrial beings are a perfect match. This goes even beyond the sci-fi narratives that explicitly thematize UFOs, a prolific sub-genre that includes such classic pieces of pop culture as <em>The X-Files <\/em>or <em>Close Encounters of the Third Kind<\/em>. If the unexplicable phenomena associated with UFOs represent a vacuum in meaning, aliens are thus the imaginative mechanism used to fill in our knowledge gaps on the existence and characteristics of life in the cosmos beyond Earth.\r\n\r\nSuppose that the contemporary moment regarding UFOs is the plot of a sci-fi alien movie. Which humanity would be elicited by these aliens? A tentative answer to this question may evoke what I would call the \u00bb<em>War of the Worlds <\/em>effect,\u00ab (the \u00bbWoW effect\u00ab for short). When H. G. Wells invented the theme of the alien invasion, his inspiration was the genocidal assault of Tasmania by the Europeans; he also had Darwinian evolution in mind. In <em>War of the Worlds<\/em>, we read about Martian \u00bbminds that are to our minds as ours are to those of the beasts that perish.\u00ab<sup class=\"is-footnote\">16<\/sup> In another passage, looking at the Martian technology, the narrator asks himself \u00bbhow an ironclad or a steam engine would seem to an intelligent lower animal.\u00ab<sup class=\"is-footnote\">17<\/sup>\r\n\r\nWells\u2019s book and others have being pointed out as examples of \u00bbfantasies of reversal\u00ab that picture nineteenth-century Europeans as victims of the same colonization process they were carrying out on other continents. Their portrayal as \u00bbnational security\u00ab threats \u2013 apart from being a good excuse to justify more military spending \u2013 revive these fantasies in contemporary times. The logic is based on a structuring dichotomy between colonizer and colonized, in which the first is provided with a <em>more advanced<\/em> technology that allows for the colonial domination of the second. If we are the ones being visited by extraterrestrial entities, then the role of Columbus is being played by this still unrevealed Other. We lost the galactic Space Race by a wide margin.\r\n\r\nAccording to the most accepted anthropological theories of Wells\u2019s time, every human society on Earth might develop through the same steps of European civilization in due time; in fact, non-European peoples were examples of different stages of European history. Wells\u2019s book is an example of how this logic can be applied to the whole cosmos: in every place of the universe where the right conditions are found, life would develop the same way \u2013 this would necessarily lead to the emergence, in proper time, of something close to humans. And like humans, those beings would be subjected to the same steps of socio-cultural development. In the case of Wells\u2019s Martians, since Mars is \u2013 according to Kant\u2019s nebular hypothesis \u2013 older than Earth, its inhabitants would have had more time to evolve, and, therefore, would be ahead of us in the technological scale. Mars would also be a dying planet, and this would be the cause of them regarding \u00bbthis earth with envious eyes.\u00ab\r\n\r\nIn sociocultural anthropology, evolutionism has been overcome since the first decades of the twentieth century by different trends of relativism; or by a neo-evolutionism that tries to get rid of the most explicitly racist assumptions of old times. Yet social evolutionism remains a strong, structuring framework in a variety of modern contexts. In science fiction, it is also possible to identify a shift from Wells\u2019s evolutionism to a more relativist approach to extraterrestrials. Many sci-fi writers would later try to imagine bodies and intelligences that are not at all similar to those of humans. This would lead to a certain crisis of the possibility of representing an alien body, what Fredric Jameson calls \u00bbthe unknowability thesis\u00ab that characterizes the work of Stanislaw Lem, and of which the most well-known example is the incomprehensible ocean of <em>Solaris<\/em>.\r\n\r\nIn the case of UFOs, the WoW effect comprises a paradoxical mix of profound admiration for this marvelous, inscrutable technology of which we can only dream of, and the absolute fear of domination that it may represent. The humanity alienated by UFOs as they have been recently appearing in the media can be characterized as military-minded, hierarchically inferior, and panic-stricken. It may also be a humanity more prone to talk about uncomfortable subjects than it was a few decades ago. It is also a never-quite-modern humanity that waits for the final arrival of extraterrestrial intelligences as they would hope for a new messiah.<sup class=\"is-footnote\">18<\/sup>\r\n<h5><strong>Speculative cosmotechnics<\/strong><\/h5>\r\nMaybe the intelligent beings behind UFOs are not so much like \u00bbus\u00ab in regard to colonialism and extermination. The good news is that, if they were, we would probably already have been wiped out from the face of the Earth, or be working for our ET bosses. Apparently, we\u2019re not. We could take this as an opportunity to rethink our relation to technology and, most importantly, the presumption that modern humans are on the top of the scale of progress.\r\n\r\nYuk Hui\u2019s concept of cosmotechnics gains another dimension when looked at from this angle. If we can identify a multiplicity of concepts of technics among different cultural traditions \u2013 as in the case Hui makes of the different relation to technics implied by Chinese philosophy \u2013 then why would we assume that extraterrestrial beings would have the same relation to technology as \u00bbwe\u00ab do? Hui calls cosmotechnics \u00bbthe unification between the cosmic order and the moral order through technical activities.\u00ab<sup class=\"is-footnote\">19<\/sup> Cosmotechnics are multiple; they diffract technology into a diversity of practices constrained by specific cosmologies. The concept makes technics and cosmology inseparable, resisting a tendency of technology to be considered a universal, homogeneous entity.\r\n\r\nIf UFOs are technical products, we should expect them to originate in relation to cosmotechnics completely different from the ones we know. Slowing down our assumptions about what UFOs \u00bbreally\u00ab are must also involve a questioning of our current conceptions regarding technology, and its \u00bbmoderncentric\u00ab bias. We should be careful in identifying how much of our views on this unknown technology results from a mirroring of modernity\u2019s own cosmotechnical milieu.\r\n<h5><strong>Coda<\/strong><\/h5>\r\nWhen I was eight, I was not scared about being colonized by ETs \u2013 at least, not consciously. I would not have the conceptual repertoire to think in those terms, even if my own body is a fruit of the history of colonization in Brazil.\r\n\r\nIn his book, Jung interpreted the fear of UFOs seen in dreams as a manifestation of the fear of death, a substitution that does not convince me completely. The book is a long exploration of archetypes associated with visions and dreams involving UFOs. But in the last chapter, he recognizes that since visions are sometimes confirmed by radar images or photographic material, they cannot be completely reduced to psychic phenomena. He concludes with two options: either the psychic projections \u00bbthrow back a radar echo,\u00ab or the observation of real objects \u00bbaffords an opportunity for mythological projections.\u00ab<sup class=\"is-footnote\">20<\/sup>\r\n\r\nI still don\u2019t know where my fear came from, as much as what this factual residue of UFOs might be. What can I say? While I am writing this text, I would wake up almost every night to drink some water. I leave a bottle on the windowsill near the bed. The curtains are invariably closed, but you can see some light coming through. I always avoid looking upwards.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\"><\/a>"},{"acf_fc_layout":"content_footnotes","acfe_flexible_layout_title":"Fu\u00dfnoten","bgcolor":"","footnotes_list_hide_numbers":false,"footnotes":[{"footnote":"Carl Gustav Jung: <em>Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies<\/em>. Princeton 1978."},{"footnote":"Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean: \u00bbNo Longer in Shadows, Pentagon\u2019s U.F.O. Unit Will Make Some Findings Public,\u00ab in:<em> The New York Times<\/em>, June 23, 2021. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/07\/23\/us\/politics\/pentagon-ufo-harry-reid-navy.html?searchResultPosition=10\">https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/07\/23\/us\/politics\/pentagon-ufo-harry-reid-navy.html?searchResultPosition=10<\/a> (accessed June 9, 2021)."},{"footnote":"Adam Gabbatt: \u00bbFrom hearsay to hard evidence: are UFOs about to go mainstream?,\u00ab in: <em>The Guardian<\/em>, May 29, 2021. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2021\/may\/29\/ufos-uap-america-pentagon-report\">https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2021\/may\/29\/ufos-uap-america-pentagon-report<\/a><u> (accessed <\/u>June 9, 2021)."},{"footnote":"Gideon Lewis-Kraus: \u00bbHow the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously,\u00ab in:<em> The New Yorker,<\/em> April 30, 2021. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/magazine\/2021\/05\/10\/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriously\">https:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/magazine\/2021\/05\/10\/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriously<\/a> (accessed June 9, 2021)."},{"footnote":"Reis Thebault: \u00bbThanks to Trump-era covid relief bill, a UFO report may soon be public \u2013 and it\u2019ll be big, ex-official says,\u00ab in: <em>The Washington Post<\/em>, March 23, 2021. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/national-security\/2021\/03\/23\/ufo-report-covid-bill\/\">https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/national-security\/2021\/03\/23\/ufo-report-covid-bill\/<\/a> (accessed June 9, 2021)."},{"footnote":"See <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cefaa.gob.cl\/home\/quienes-somos\">http:\/\/www.cefaa.gob.cl\/home\/quienes-somos<\/a>."},{"footnote":"See <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.br\/mj\/pt-br\/assuntos\/noticias\/mais-de-700-registros-de-aparicao-de-ovnis-no-brasil\">https:\/\/www.gov.br\/mj\/pt-br\/assuntos\/noticias\/mais-de-700-registros-de-aparicao-de-ovnis-no-brasil<\/a>."},{"footnote":"It is difficult to define the \u00bbwe\u00ab in this context. Maybe what I mean by \u00bbwe\u00ab could be defined as the group-subject that \u00bbcritically trust\u00ab scientific discourse and its standardized translations, and whose worlding is composed in conflicting association with shared assumptions and knowledge expressed in institutionalized forums of debate, including the media."},{"footnote":"See Leslie Kean: <em>UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record<\/em>. New York 2010."},{"footnote":"Ibid."},{"footnote":"Helene Cooper,\u00a0Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean: \u00bbGlowing Auras and \u203aBlack Money\u2039: The Pentagon\u2019s Mysterious U.F.O. Program,\u00ab in: <em>The New York Times<\/em>, December 16, 2017. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/12\/16\/us\/politics\/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html\">https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/12\/16\/us\/politics\/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html<\/a> (accessed June 9, 2021)."},{"footnote":"Isabelle Stengers: \u00bbScience-fiction et exp\u00e9rimentation,\u00ab in: Gilbert Hottois, <em>Philosophie et Science-Fiction<\/em>. Paris 2000."},{"footnote":"Karl Marx: <em>The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844<\/em>. Buffalo 1988, pp. 77-78."},{"footnote":"Ibid."},{"footnote":"See Ted Chiang: <em>Stories of Your Life and Others. <\/em>New York 2002."},{"footnote":"H.G. Wells: <em>War of The Worlds.<\/em> London 1898."},{"footnote":"Ibid."},{"footnote":"An interesting approximation of UFOs and religion can be found in D. W. Pasulka: <em>American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Techonology<\/em>. Oxford 2019."},{"footnote":"Yuk Hui, \u00bbThe Question Concerning Technology in China,\u00ab in: <em>Cosmotechnics.<\/em> Cambridge MA 2016, p. 19."},{"footnote":"See note 1."}]}],"intro_preview_headline":"The Risk of Fiction","intro_preview_txt":"<strong>Eric Macedo, current fellow in the scientific sphere of practice, has been afraid of UFOs since childhood. Working on intersections between anthropology and philosophy, he shares thoughts on the UFO phenomenon and how it could be reappraised through a decolonial lens. \u00bbMaybe,\u00ab he writes,\u00a0\u00bbthe intelligent beings behind UFOs are not\u00a0so much like \u203aus\u2039 in regard to\u00a0colonialism and extermination.\u00ab<\/strong>","intro_preview_img":31017,"post_id_old":"","post_author":null,"post_subtitle":"Eric Macedo","post_preview_img_hide_on_single":false,"post_txt_old":"","post_pdf":"","post_copyright":"ccl_default","translated_post":false,"translations":null,"post_copyright_individual":"","post_related_posts":[29737,29853,13717],"related_posts_post":[14159]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31016","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31016"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31016\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43601,"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31016\/revisions\/43601"}],"acf:post":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/person\/14159"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13717"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29853"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29737"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31016"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"project","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/project?post=31016"},{"taxonomy":"project_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.akademie-solitude.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/project_type?post=31016"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}